By Joseph E. Edmunds* and Clayton Shillingford** Monday May 18, 2005
Dear
Prime Ministers, Dr.Joseph
E. Edmunds Dr.
Clayton A. Shillingford
INTRODUCTION This presentation to the Heads of
Government of the Windward Islands (Windward Is) is put forward by the authors
in a genuine desire to assist in the resuscitation of the industry and to
contribute to its sustainability in world trade. Growth in the island economies
and relief of poverty in the rural sector is largely dependent on developments
in agriculture and more particularly bananas. As can be seen from the attached
qualifications and experience of the authors, they have in the past played a
pivotal role in the industry of the Caribbean and have considerable experience
in advising other banana industries worldwide. BACKGROUND Production and
Market Perspectives The banana industry of the Windward Is.
was once the economic backbone of the islands, when they enjoyed specific
quotas and duty free import into the UK. With the introduction of the
tariff-only EC Common Organization of the Market in Bananas (COMB) in 1993
there began a steady decline in export value from the peak levels of the 80’s
and the early 90’s. Since then the erosion of preferences has had a devastating
effect on the island economies. In 1991, bananas contributed US$130 million to export
earnings, US$32 million in Dominica, US$60 million in St.Lucia, US$34 million
in St.Vincent, and US$4 million in Grenada. The trend since then has been
progressively downward (Table1). The
share of bananas in export revenue from the Windward Is was estimated as a
third in 1993 but was much higher in earlier years. Table 1: FOB
Export Values in US$ million, 1994-2004,
Source: WIBDECO[1];
quoted in National Economic Research Associates (NERA) Report, 2003 and other
WIBDECO sources. For Grenada (-) signifies less than 1.0 million tonnes. The banana industry was the principal
employer of the populations of the islands. The Oxford Policy Management Report
asserts that in 1993-2001 banana sector employment (transportation, operations
etc) was as high as 67,000 or 18% of the working population (age 15 to 60
years). From 1994 to the present there has been a steady decline in sector
employment as well as the number of growers who deliver bananas for export,
falling from 23,000 in 1994 to less than 5000 in 2003 (Table 2). The result has been, in general, a significant decline in the island
economies, increased migration and in
particular, increased rural poverty. Table 2: Number
of Active Growers in the Windward Islands in ‘000, 1994-2003
Source: WIBDECO, as quoted in the NERA
Report, 2003 and other WIBDECO sources NA, Not available The decline in number of growers, which is
estimated at more than 60% compared with pre-1994 levels, has been matched by a
significant fall in area under banana cultivation. Among the three largest
exporters, the biggest proportionate fall occurred in Dominica. Grenada was down to only 10% of its previous
area but the recent hurricane
Ivan has now completely decimated
the production in that island. With
these trends the income level per farmer is estimated at an average of
US$5000-6000 per year, barely enough
to sustain a family. Export production of Windward Is bananas
almost doubled to 260,000 tonnes in the period 1981 to 1990/2 but thereafter
began a very steep decline. By 1994, export production was down to 157,000 tonnes
and now stands at 84,000 tonnes in 2004, a drop of 46% (Table 3). Table
3.Production of Bananas in the Windward Islands in ‘000 tonnes, 1994 to 2004,
Source: WIBDECO; quoted in IMF Country
Report 03/29 ibid, NERA Report and
other WIBDECO sources In 1993 a total of 470,000 tonnes of
bananas were imported into the UK from all sources rising to 833,000 tonnes in
2002. By that time, Windward Is producers had lost significant market share to
other ACP and dollar sources even while there was significant growth in the UK
market. Evaluating the
Viability of the Industry We should examine carefully the two main
factors, low productivity and high cost of production, in the reduced viability
of the Windward Is industries. Comparison with other African, Caribbean and
Pacific States (ACP) and Dollar sources is instructive. Some estimate of the
comparative costs of production can be gained from the FOB unit values of their
exports (Table 4) Table 4:
Comparison of FOB Unit Values of Banana Exports in 1999
Source: WIBDECO,
other ACP sources, FAO Yearbook as quoted in the NERA Report These data are only indicative because
actual production costs are not readily available since Windward Is. farmers
hardly keep records until recently following
EUREP-GAP, a system of UK supermarket traceable requirements on pesticide use,
waste disposal and labour standards. Receiving and loading costs are also high
as indicated by Table 5 Table 5. Receiving
and Loading Costs in US$/tonne, 1994-1997
The contrast of conditions of production
is often cited for the large gap in productivity between the Windward Is. and
competitive producers. (Table 6) Table 6:
Comparative Production Conditions
Source: Modified
from UNCTAD website (from NERA Report) To the Windward Is. constraints we can add
shortage of capital, low labour productivity, an aging work force, higher
natural risks such as hurricanes, lack of access to efficient distribution
channels, poor quality controls, and less effective management and marketing
strategies. The banana business has very special characteristics. It is a
highly perishable crop, requires careful growing conditions, packaging,
transport, handling, ripening and distribution into the market place. To
these challenges we must now add the increasing role and demands of the UK
supermarkets. On the positive side,
banana growing is labour intensive, delivers a relatively quick return on effort
and investment, provides a weekly income year round, and the crop recovers
quickly from hurricanes and other natural disasters. Besides there is the economic
benefit of the banana boats on the return voyage carrying freight of
foodstuffs, raw materials and other general cargo at lower cost than would
otherwise apply. The EU has provided the traditional ACP
countries with funds to improve quality and productivity through irrigation and
some other appropriate technologies
but the implementation has not been
sufficient to offset the fall in export production. The key indicators to evaluate viability
are increased labour and land productivity, improved quality, maintenance of
share in the UK market, export volumes to meet market demand and export
revenue. In each case, the prospects
for improved viability are based on the issues and recommendations enumerated
in the proposed resuscitation program which is necessary to restore confidence
of the growers and Government in the future of the industry. Continued decline in
prices and export volumes against more destabilizing changes, and anticipated greater
competition next year in the marketplace will spell reduced viability probably
to be accompanied by grave economic and social consequences for the Windward
Islands. The extent and pace of the downward spiral will continue unabated and
only a well thought out plan and rapid response could help at this late date. Management and
Technological Perspectives The industry of the Windward Is. was once
centrally managed and took advantage of economies of scale by bulk purchasing
of materials in a timely manner, resulting in lower administrative costs, and
in general lower costs of materials needed for production. The industry received its technical
direction from the Windward Islands Banana Research and Development Center in
St. Lucia. This Center and the sister
organization, the Jamaica Banana Board Research and Development Department were
the major institutions for banana R&D in the Western Hemisphere. These centers were staffed by the most
experienced banana scientists in all aspects, breeding, agronomy, engineering,
pest and disease control, and quality improvement. This is demonstrated by the
role they played in the development of banana industries in Latin America
serving the small banana growers who did not have access to the R&D of the
banana companies such as Chiquita. Scientific
personnel from the Caribbean Centers also served as advisers to international
agencies in the Pacific Islands and Africa and were founding members of the
Association for Cooperation in Banana Research in the Caribbean and American
Tropics (ACORBAT). In addition, Caribbean scientific
personnel from these Centers presented major papers in banana research and
development at international meetings and produced important advisory
publications in research annual reports and other international journals which
served as the foundation for continuous improvement of the banana industries in
the Caribbean and worldwide. It is now evident that the Caribbean
banana industry has lost its leading position as the most important revenue
earner of the islands and it has ceased to generate new or modified
technologies which are so important for the survival of the industry in a
global economy. The R&D arm of the industry has been considerably reduced
and the technological base of the industry needs to be reviewed. The industry has lost its international
technological leadership and is rapidly losing ground as a producer of bananas
for the international marketplace. AREAS FOR CONSIDERATION The survival and sustainability of
businesses, industries, and enterprises in the developing world will depend upon
the introduction of appropriate management and technological systems which
could give them an edge in the global market place. It is clear that the Windward Is. banana
industry is losing its place
in its traditional market. Policy direction, modern management systems, research and
development and the application of appropriate technologies are needed as the
roadmap for sustainability of the industry. Further, it is evident that there has been
a regression in many of these areas over the years. The future of the industry will depend upon the resolve of our
leaders to address the present situation with initiatives to avert a complete
collapse of an industry which is so important for the social and economic
development of the islands. The following areas are recommended for
consideration: 1.
Organization, Management, and Administration 2.
Improvements in technological areas and support services A.
Pest
and disease control B.
Agronomic
practices C.
Fruit
quality D.
Diversification
of other crops with bananas E.
Irrigation F.
Organic
farming G.
Scientific
support staff and extension services Organization,
Management, and Administration In order to
narrow the gap in some of the differences elucidated in Table 6 above under
the heading Comparative Production Conditions, it is necessary to introduce
management, administrative and organizational structures which would redound to
the benefit of banana farmers and the industry as a whole. The industry
must be looked upon as a production system with component small parts operating
in synchrony towards a common objective – increasing productivity, improving
quality and reducing cost of production. In order to
achieve this, future banana farmers must be identified within a workable
demographic positioning as partners in a competitive global market. The substantial
reduction in number of growers and acreages under cultivation requires
immediate analysis. There is a need for a review of grower registration and an
analysis of the reasons for their abandonment of farming with a view to assisting
a reduced core of workers in achieving higher labour productivity and
production and improved quality for the sustenance of the industry. The issue
of the administration of the industry is crucial and forward planning is urgent
at this point. The apparent absence of a comprehensive plan for the resuscitation of the industries
is not a positive sign from the vantage point of industry administration.
Additionally, growers must become stronger partners in the resuscitation plan
through appropriate training in banana technology and good business practices
as we enter an even more competitive global environment. The various
reports that were examined all point to the dismal state of the industry. The
Windward Is. industries were expected to benefit from the protections afforded by
the Lome Convention and its successor the Cotonou Agreement. These agreements
were set up to ensure continued viability of ACP banana industries by stating as
in the Cotonou Agreement that “The
Community agrees to examine and where necessary take measures aimed at ensuring
the continued viability of their banana export industries and the continuing
outlet for their bananas on the Community market”. Current evidence
suggests that these arrangements have offered progressively less protection to
the most vulnerable and higher cost Windward Is. producers. The remaining
option therefore is to beef up the administration and management structures and
where appropriate introduce technologies and practices which would lead to the
achievement of improved labour productivity, production and quality. There is
therefore a need to reexamine the structure, organization, administration and
management of the industry as a matter of urgency. This would include attention to infrastructure, methods of
lowering cost of material inputs for production, their storage and availability
in times of need and their distribution. Possible Improvements in Technical Areas and Support Services
(Needs Assessment) Pest and Disease
Control Adequate pest and disease control is vital
for optimum crop production. The major
disease plaguing the industry today is leaf spot (Yellow Sigatoka). Although the epidemiology of the disease is
well known, the basic elements of management of control are not followed resulting
in sporadic outbreaks of the disease resulting in loss of production and poor
fruit quality. Quality improvement is critical to adding value to bananas. It
is well known that the disease is caused by a fungus whose spores are carried
by the wind. When the spores alight on
a banana leaf, if the weather conditions are favorable, the spores germinate
and the plant becomes infected. Therefore if control is to be effective it must
be based largely on preventive sprays. The eventual introduction of the more
virulent Black Sigatoka will make control even more difficult. It is therefore imperative that the
control of the disease must not be left to the individual farmers but must be
coordinated to minimize spread of the spores from one field to another. Leaf spot control programs must therefore be
managed and implemented to take into account groups of contiguous banana
farmers, abandoned farms as sources of infection and poor control practices by
some farmers. Unfortunately the industry has lost
thousands of tonnes of production over the last two years as a result of poor
leaf spot control, either through the rejection of leaf spot fruit or poor
yields and quality resulting from disease.
This can be averted through a managed system of control and the use of known
and practiced technology. There is need for a review of existing
operational systems and the demographics of banana holdings in each of the
islands, so that control programs can be recommended together with management
systems to minimize leaf spot outbreaks. Borer and nematode control are critical
for the optimum uptake of nutrients from the soil. The banana plant, because of
its rapid growth requires vast amounts of water and nutrients. Borers damage
the plant by larvae boring tunnels through the underground rhizome. Nematodes
feed on the root system, and cause severe lesions. These tunnels and lesions
are then invaded by soil bacteria and fungi. The resulting decay of the rhizome
and roots weaken the uptake capacity and anchorage of the plant, causing
reduced nutrition and severe toppling. In many instances toppling has been
recorded as high as 50% loss of production due to borer and nematode damage.
The unfortunate practice of replanting is often the result of damage by these
pests. Our competitors in Latin America and elsewhere consider banana as a
permanent crop. Plantations can be 20 to 30 years old. Replanting is not practiced unless
plantations are damaged by flooding, hurricane or windstorms or there is need
for introduction of new varieties. A review of present practices needs to be
undertaken. Timely application of effective control measures as well as the
number and quality of the applications recommended are essential for success in the control of these pests.
These measures cannot be left to the discretion of farmers especially the
smaller ones. As a matter of urgency, technological advances and their
introduction and management in these areas need to be applied to the industry. Agronomic Practices There is need for a review of agronomic
practices under different growing conditions.
This is very important for improved productivity. Agronomic practices must be related to
topography, soil type and ecological considerations. One must not apply the same agronomic recommendations for all
conditions. Fertilizer formulations,
frequency of application and placement must be related to soil type and
topography as much as possible. The loss of fertilizer through run-off water with rains, particularly on sloping
land, must be minimized. Monitoring of soil and leaf mineral status
must be done to determine the most appropriate fertilizer formulation to be
used. Such was the practice in the
past. Modern concepts of fertilizer
application as practiced in cropping systems in more developed countries should
be applied to save on fertilizer costs and wastage. For instance, follower
setting and fertilizer use application can lead to increased productivity when
synchronized as part of a discipline of crop husbandry and management. Present agronomic practices need to be
reviewed and an integrated package of recommendations presented which would
save in the cost of production and improve yields. Fruit Quality The market demands a consistent premium
quality fruit. Our industry suffers
from fluctuations in quality resulting in unfavorable supermarket and consumer
reaction, poor market prices and loss of revenue. Poor quality is partly related to inadequate pre-harvest agronomic
practices and pest and disease control (particularly leaf spot control) and
secondly to a sequence of post-harvest factors including field transport,
handling, processing, packaging, storage, transatlantic ship transport and
ripening. A review needs to be made of practices
which militate against the production of high quality fruit for the market and
recommendations put in place. Diversification of Other Crops with
Bananas A considerable amount of work has been
done in this field in the Windward Islands and many recommendations have been
made to the industry. Diversification with bananas is one way of developing a
sound agricultural diversification program for the islands. It has been demonstrated that in the first
three to four months of a new banana field there is an open canopy which could
be planted to a variety of short term crops (e.g. peanuts, potatoes and other root crops, and corn.) Interplanting bananas with peanuts improves
the nitrogen status of the soil and concomitant
banana production. Diversification of
the crop species can help in reducing leaf spot. There are known marketable bananas which are resistant to leaf
spot which need to be tested commercially.
There is need for a diversification policy
based upon local, regional and global markets for the intercrops. Further, recommendations need to be put in
place on the use of bananas as a nurse crop in the reestablishment of permanent
crops after a hurricane or in a tree crop diversification program. These
practices could be developed as an agricultural policy on land use versus land
capability programs. Where applicable,
the marketing of intercrops as part of export cargo to Europe could help reduce
shipping costs. The contribution of a diversified crop program to growth in
tourism and food security is also of paramount importance. Further, banana production
should not be considered in isolation, but rather as part of a system of
agricultural production and management. Irrigation Much emphasis and finance have been put in
irrigation in an attempt to increase productivity in areas where natural rainfall
is inadequate. This innovation must be examined in the context of a holistic
production package in terms of the various agronomic practices and other areas
mentioned in earlier sections. For example, fertilizer and nematicides can be
delivered through the irrigation system in a measured way. Also leaf spot can
be exacerbated if irrigation is applied unto foliage which unduly increases
field humidity and leaf wetness. The other key aspect of water management is to
ensure the correct amount of irrigation at the right time and that drainage is
adequate to prevent drowning of the root system. An integrated program needs to be
established in areas with irrigation, which takes into account the relatedness
of other necessary practices and the maximization of yields. Organic Farming Organic farming which minimizes or
eliminates the use of chemicals is receiving popular appeal in the market
place. This is an effort at value
adding by attempting to differentiate the product, but investment and
certification requirements may be difficult to attain. As laudable as this
practice may be, it must be accompanied by sound scientific data through the
monitoring of the mineral status of soils and leaves for optimum production and
to determine the need for changes in the organic content of minerals as
necessary. As in “fair-trade” and special packs, there appears to be an
opportunity to exploit the organic niche market. A bulk system for the production of
organic material needs to be introduced as well as a monitoring mechanism of
the necessary soil nutrient levels for optimum crop production. Scientific Support Staff and Extension
Services In order to implement improvements in the
technological base of the banana industry of the Windward Islands, it is
necessary that there be in place, a minimum of support technical staff with
basic laboratory equipment and back-up extension services in the field. An assessment needs to be made of the
present capability of the industry to meet the present and future technological
demands in a global perspective and recommendations made to meet those demands.
In this regard the industry will need to put in place a program with adequate
staffing for the training of farmers in areas related to food safety, environmental
protection, occupational and health safety. CONCLUSION The banana industry of the Windward Is.
can be resuscitated, and sustained in the world market if there is an in-depth
review of the administration, management and technological base of the industry
to guide policy and implementation of appropriate management practices. Donor assistance needs to be properly
channeled to produce optimal impact in the shortest possible time. The tariff
scenarios being considered suggest that the Windward Is exports would suffer even more drastically if
action is delayed. In the short run efficient input availability and
distribution and technical aid and innovations as proposed will be critical.
The authors are
of the view that there is need to give due consideration to the above areas for
the sustainability of the industry. In
so doing, the industry could stand a chance for significant improvement as a
major revenue earner, and regain some of its losses in the market place. To
that end productivity gains and quality improvement consequent on these
recommendations could make a significant difference to continued industry
viability. Given the unique structure of the banana industry
of the Windward Is., consisting of a large number of small holdings scattered
over non-contiguous acreages in four islands, there is scope for intensive
banana farming under sound management and technological inputs with the
necessary support staff. This would require the identification of a core of
growers who would be registered as qualified for the production of export
bananas, producing 10 tonnes or more per acre. It is our expectation that with
improved agricultural practices the industry can be more competitive than at
present and be in a better position to weather future erosion in preferential
treatment in its traditional market The authors are
of the view that in this world of global competitiveness, no industry can
survive without the underpinning of appropriate quality management systems, and
sound science and technology. This is
true for our banana industry as it is and has been for agricultural industries
in more developed countries. The
authors believe there is much scope for improvement in productivity and quality
at reduced costs if due consideration is given to the above considerations. The authors have attempted to summarize a
set of key issues, which, if addressed now can lead to more viable banana
enterprises in the islands. We are fully aware of the concerns of our
Governments, industry management, growers and the general public as the industry
slide continues. We are also aware of the efforts being put in place by all
concerned. For the present, in spite of serious hardship for the people, rural as
well as urban communities have been able to survive, at least for the time
being, through a combination of employment in the service sector, emigration
and remittances from overseas. At the same time we are aware of the significant
decreased income to farm families, decreased revenue to countries and the
concomitant family strife and economic dislocation. We remain available for further focused
discussion on possible options that would lead to rapid implementation of the
above recommendations. Resume: Joseph E. Edmunds, Ph.D., OBE 4601 Bel Pre Rd, Rockville, MD 20853 301-460-6772(phone), 301-460-6773
(fax) Email: eldica1935@aol.com Professional
Experience/Agriculture and Related Fields
Research Fellow in Nematology at the University of the
West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, 1966-1971 and Director of Research and
Development of the Windward Islands Banana Growers Association (WINBAN Research
and Development) 1971-1984, before appointment as Ambassador of St. Lucia to
the United Nations, the Organization of American States and the United States,
1984-1997. Published
extensively in the fields of Nematology, Plant Pathology, and Banana
Technology; played a leadership role in those fields internationally; and acted
from time to time as Managing Director of the Windward Islands Banana Industry. Technical advice
to the Windward Islands banana industry emanated from WINBAN R&D Center in
St. Lucia with experiments and field officers in each of the islands. As Ambassador of
St. Lucia in the United States, championed the case for the banana industry to
the US Congress, US State Department, and the OAS. As Director of the OAS office in Suriname gave advice to small
banana growers in that country at the request of the Inter-American Institute
for Cooperation in Agriculture (IICA) International Consultant/Advisor
1966-1984 The Commonwealth Fund for Technical Cooperation (CFTC)
and the South Pacific Bureau for Technical Cooperation (SPEC) – Training
Program in banana technology held in Rarotonga, Cook Islands, for technical and
extension staff from countries of the South Pacific. Union of Banana
Exporting Countries of Latin America (UPEB) – Identification of banana research
priorities and the establishment of research networking. Canadian
International Development Agency (CIDA) – Determination of the training needs
in agriculture for the Windward and Leeward Islands. International
Development and Research Agency of Canada (IDRC) – Review of funded programs in
cropping systems in Cameroon and Nigeria. National Institute
of Agriculture in Ecuador (INIAP) – Advice on banana nematode control in Guayaquil. Membership of Banana
Organizations
Organization of Tropical American Nematologists (OTAN)
– Past President and Founding Member.
Serving Nematologists in Latin America, the Caribbean, and Tropical
North America. Presented
several papers on banana research and development. The Association for Cooperation in Banana Research in the
Caribbean and American Tropics (ACORBAT) – Past President and Founding
member. Serving banana research institutions
and banana growers in the Western Hemisphere.
Presented several papers on banana research and development. Science and Technology, Conservation, Integrated
development Recently included in a list of Caribbean Icons in
Science, Technology and Innovation. A
founding member of the National Trust, The National Research and Development
Foundation, and the Naturalist Society of St. Lucia. Cited as a “Pioneer in the Conservation Movement in St.
Lucia.” Has given many lectures on the
concept of integrated development with emphasis on land capability versus land
use and the mobilization of national and human resources and institutional
development within the realities of local, regional, and global parameters. Honors and Awards, Lectures and Publications Received many distinguished awards for contributions
to science, and published over 50 papers in areas related to agriculture,
science, technology, education, democracy, and governance. Has lectured extensively at various local,
regional, and international institutions. Education PhD – Nematology (Cornell University) MSc - Plant Pathology (Cornell University) BSA - Agronomy (University of Puerto Rico) Language Proficiency English – Native Language Spanish –Working Knowledge French - Some understanding French Creole – Working Knowledge Resume: Clayton A. Shillingford,
PhD
1522 Braken Ave, Wilmington, DE 19808;
302-239-9643 (phone), 302-234-4148 (fax) Or Checkhall Valley, Massacre, Commonwealth of Dominica; 767-449-2412
(phone), 767-449-3089 (fax) Email:
shillica@aol.com Accomplishments
and Abilities
Highly organized, results‑oriented
leader with extensive expertise in corporate, university and privately owned
enterprises. Skilled in team building, professional recruitment, staffing and
employer/labour relations, diversity awareness, and performance measurement President of the Association for
Cooperation in Banana Research in the Caribbean and American Tropics,
(ACORBAT), 1975‑1981, receiving several awards for leadership of ACORBAT.
Recognized by numerous DuPont corporate awards for contributions to product
development, quality assurance, marketing, diversity, and people development.
President of the DuPont Black Employees Network, (1994 -1996). Organized, led, and participated in several
international conferences including the International Congress of Plant
Pathology, the American Phytopathological Society, the Organization of Tropical
American Nematologists, the International Network for Improvement of Banana and
Plantain, and the International Society of African Scientists. Published
numerous papers and reviews on banana diseases and agricultural products for
several publications and conference proceedings. Demonstrated ability in planning, designing, and
implementing programs in research, business and marketing. Proven verbal and
written communication skills. Possesses a strong commitment to environmental
protection, broad botanical knowledge and extensive, diverse experience in
agricultural research, development, marketing, and sound business practices. Retiring in 1998 from DuPont, time is now devoted to
doing consulting work in agriculture and environmental protection and leading
the Dominica Academy of Arts & Sciences (http://www.da-academy.org/) which is
registered with the IRS as a non-profit organization devoted to assisting in
Dominica’s development by engaging nationals in the Diaspora and on the island.
Professional
Experience
Consultancies International
Consultant, UNDP Supported “Dominica’s Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan” 2002-2004 Consultant, DuPont Agricultural Products 1999-2003 Dominica
Academy of Arts & Sciences (DAAS)
President 2002-2005 DuPont Agricultural Products, Stine Lab, Wilmington, DE Research Associate, Product Support and Renewal 1993
– 1998
Product Development Manager, Worldwide Banana Markets 1988 - 1992 Product
Development Manager, Latin America and the Caribbean 1980 - 1987 University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, Visiting Professor 1979 Jamaica Banana Board, Kingston, Jamaica Technical Director, R & D Dept 1977 - 1979 Manager, Crop Productivity
1977 University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, Research Assistant 1975 - 1977 Jamaica Banana Board, Kingston, Jamaica Manager, Quality Control 1972
- 1975 Senior
Plant Pathologist, R&D 1970 - 1972 Pathologist, R & D Department 1967 - 1969 Professional Affiliations ·
Diploma of
Membership of the Imperial College of Science and Technology ·
Sigma Xi, The
Scientific Research Society of North America ·
American
Phytopathological Society, (APS), Caribbean Division ·
Association
for Cooperation in Banana Research in the Caribbean and American Tropics,
(ACORBAT) ·
Organization
of Tropical American Nematologists, (OTAN) ·
International
Network for the Improvement of Banana and Plantain, (INIBAP) ·
International
Society of African Scientists, (ISAS) ·
President,
Dominica Academy of Arts & Sciences (DAAS) Education
University of Illinois PhD, Plant Pathology 1977 University of the West Indies Diploma in Management 1973 University of London MSc. Mycology and
Plant Pathology 1968 University of the West Indies MSc. Botany/Dominica Forest Ecology 1967 University of the West Indies BSc. Botany, Chemistry, and Mathematics 1962 [1]WIBDECO, the Windward Islands
Banana Development and Exporting Company is a 50:50 joint venture between the
Governments and the Growers Organizations and Fyffes, which acquired the Geest
banana business in 1996. Geest is now essentially a shipping company with
licenses to import ACP fruit, which it trades to WIBDECO. The assets of the
joint venture include a European dollar banana marketing business. |